Re: dirty_ratio & dirty_background_ratio settings with huge memory

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pinker <pinker(at)onet(dot)eu>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dirty_ratio & dirty_background_ratio settings with huge memory
Date: 2018-03-06 13:19:10
Message-ID: 4319071a-3cbf-cf63-c3a2-69aef34be930@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 03/06/2018 01:16 PM, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> pinker wrote:
>> I've got cutomer with really huge RAM, now it's:
>> total used free shared buffers cached
>> Mem: 3102111 3052596 49515 208801 992 2961185
>> -/+ buffers/cache: 90418 3011693
>> Swap: 8191 1 8190
>>
>> (free -m)
>>
>> and before it was twice more (6TB).
>>
>> and trying to figure out how to set dirty_ratio & dirty_background_ratio
>> parameters. Even for normal sized server those default sizes are to high,
>> but now would be ridiculously huge, respectively 1,24TB and 300GB.
>> I'm thinking about 1 percent for dirty_ratio and not using
>> dirty_background_ratio because it's not possible to set it below 1% but to
>> set dirty_background_bytes instead to about 1-2GB.
>> Maybe someone has got other experience with RAM of this size and those
>> settings?
>
> Yes, you should set vm.dirty_background_bytes and vm.dirty_bytes
> and not use the *_ratio settings.
>
> 2 GB for vm.dirty_background_bytes and 1 GB for vm.dirty_bytes sounds fine.
>

It should be the other way around: dirty_background_bytes < dirty_bytes

regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2018-03-06 13:40:51 Re: dirty_ratio & dirty_background_ratio settings with huge memory
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2018-03-06 12:16:59 Re: dirty_ratio & dirty_background_ratio settings with huge memory