Re: Proposal: Solving the "Return proper affected tuple

From: Steve Howe <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Solving the "Return proper affected tuple
Date: 2002-09-10 03:26:49
Message-ID: 43171196277.20020910002649@carcass.dhs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Christopher,

Monday, September 9, 2002, 11:36:44 PM, you wrote:

CKL> Sorry guys - it's killing me! It's 'affected' in the subject line - not
CKL> 'effected'!!! Sigh :)

lol... my bad, English is not my primary language and these things
just seem to happen sometimes... I apologize.

-------------
Best regards,
Steve Howe mailto:howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-10 03:27:13 Re: [JDBC] problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc
Previous Message Steve Howe 2002-09-10 03:25:48 Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue