Re: [PATCH] Implement uuid_version()

From: Jose Luis Tallon <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement uuid_version()
Date: 2019-06-11 14:47:28
Message-ID: 43139b0d-6a97-d353-0de3-0ecd79187ce9@adv-solutions.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/6/19 13:11, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-06-11 12:31, Jose Luis Tallon wrote:
>> I wonder whether re-implementing some more of the extension's (ie. UUID
>> v5) in terms of PgCrypto and in-core makes sense / would actually be
>> accepted into core?
> Those other versions are significantly more complicated to implement,
> and I don't think many people really need them, so I'm not currently
> interested.

For the record: I was volunteering to implement that functionality. I'd
only need some committer to take a look and erm... commit it :)

Thank you, in any case; The patch you have provided will be very useful.

    / J.L.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-06-11 14:49:28 Re: check_recovery_target_lsn() does a PG_CATCH without a throw
Previous Message Sergei Kornilov 2019-06-11 14:29:41 Re: check_recovery_target_lsn() does a PG_CATCH without a throw