From: | Jeffrey Melloy <jmelloy(at)visualdistortion(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, iharding(at)destinydata(dot)com, CSN <cool_screen_name90001(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: POSS. FEATURE REQ: "Dynamic" Views |
Date: | 2005-08-29 20:09:27 |
Message-ID: | 43136B77.5070107@visualdistortion.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Greg Stark wrote:
>Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>
>
>>Well, I just added to TODO:
>>
>> * Allow VIEW/RULE recompilation when the underlying tables change
>>
>>Is dynamic view a industry-standard name? If so, I will add it to the
>>TODO.
>>
>>
>
>"DYNAMIC" is something I made up.
>
>"ALTER VIEW RECOMPILE" is Oraclese but I'm not sure what we're talking about
>here is exactly the same purpose. I'm not sure it even does anything in Oracle
>any more. It used to be that *any* DDL on underlying tables caused view on
>them to become invalid and produce errors until they were recompiled. I think
>that's changed and "recompile" may be a noop now on Oracle.
>
>
It's still necessary in Oracle 9i. Any time a table is changed that has
a view on it Bad Things Happen.
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas F. O'Connell | 2005-08-29 20:10:48 | Re: question |
Previous Message | Stijn Hoop | 2005-08-29 20:00:48 | Re: revoke on database not working as expected |