From: | Gene <genekhart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Hideyuki Kawashima" <kawasima(at)cs(dot)tsukuba(dot)ac(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS |
Date: | 2007-02-12 22:53:06 |
Message-ID: | 430d92a20702121453i7d10eadcs12b76da74a0ad3d@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I was curious to see how postgres would perform with wal on a tmpfs vs disk
here are some numbers I got from pgbench. Let me know if I did something
stupid, this is the first time I've used pgbench. The wal on tmpfs method is
not significantly faster.
[[ WAL ON TMPFS ]]
pgbench -i -s 10 -U postgres -d benchmark
...
pgbench -Upostgres -s 10 -c 10 -t 10000 benchmark
starting vacuum...end.
transaction type: TPC-B (sort of)
scaling factor: 10
number of clients: 10
number of transactions per client: 10000
number of transactions actually processed: 100000/100000
tps = 5817.693724 (including connections establishing)
tps = 5825.646441 (excluding connections establishing)
[[ WAL ON EXT2 14 U320 DRIVE RAID10 WITH BBU (same as data) ]]
pgbench -Upostgres -s 10 -c 10 -t 10000 benchmark
starting vacuum...end.
transaction type: TPC-B (sort of)
scaling factor: 10
number of clients: 10
number of transactions per client: 10000
number of transactions actually processed: 100000/100000
tps = 5653.187997 (including connections establishing)
tps = 5660.554438 (excluding connections establishing)
pgbench -Upostgres -s 100 -c 10 -t 10000 benchmark
starting vacuum...end.
transaction type: TPC-B (sort of)
scaling factor: 100
number of clients: 10
number of transactions per client: 10000
number of transactions actually processed: 100000/100000
tps = 5536.019864 (including connections establishing)
tps = 5543.834350 (excluding connections establishing)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-02-12 22:57:49 | Re: XML export function signatures |
Previous Message | fishware | 2007-02-12 22:49:04 | Visual C++ function issues |