| From: | Gene <genekhart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Areca 1260 Performance |
| Date: | 2006-12-07 16:02:27 |
| Message-ID: | 430d92a20612070802q3cffeaeav2cf40c999ebc712b@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
I'm building a SuperServer 6035B server (16 scsi drives). My schema has
basically two large tables (million+ per day) each which are partitioned
daily, and queried independently of each other. Would you recommend a raid1
system partition and 14 drives in a raid 10 or should i create separate
partitions/tablespaces for the two large tables and indexes?
Thanks
Gene
On 12/7/06, Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)007marketing(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> >> One thing that is clear from what you've posted thus far is that you
> >> are going to needmore HDs if you want to have any chance of fully
> >> utilizing your Areca HW.
> > Do you know off hand where I might find a chassis that can fit 24[+]
> > drives? The last chassis we ordered was through Supermicro, and the
> > largest they carry fits 16 drives.
>
> Chenbro has a 24 drive case - the largest I have seen. It fits the big
> 4/8 cpu boards as well.
>
> http://www.chenbro.com/corporatesite/products_01features.php?serno=43
>
>
> --
>
> Shane Ambler
> pgSQL(at)007Marketing(dot)com
>
> Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
--
Gene Hart
cell: 443-604-2679
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bill Moran | 2006-12-07 16:35:31 | Advice on selecting good values for work_mem? |
| Previous Message | Shane Ambler | 2006-12-07 15:43:30 | Re: Areca 1260 Performance |