From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai" <asmodai(at)wxs(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: _GNU_SOURCE |
Date: | 2003-10-14 01:01:54 |
Message-ID: | 4309.1066093314@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> We've been using it for awhile, and it's not broken anything. Why are
>> you so eager to make build changes with potentially wide ramifications
>> so late in the beta cycle?
> I don't know what the ramifications of _GNU_SOURCE are, but we have run
> longer without it than with it. Seems safest to have it only where we
> need it, in plperl.
No can do --- _GNU_SOURCE affects the results of configure. We either
use it or we don't, we don't get to be selective about it.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-14 01:09:33 | Re: Isolation levels READ UNCOMMITTED and REPEATABLE READ |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-14 00:48:13 | Re: [HACKERS] Sun performance - Major discovery! |