Re: Windows + IP6 progress

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Chuck McDevitt <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows + IP6 progress
Date: 2005-08-19 00:04:12
Message-ID: 430521FC.1000504@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chuck McDevitt wrote:

>I think it's because it's __stdcall, and the name gets mangled to
>include the number of parameters.
>
>
>

Aha! now it makes sense. How do we get around that in the configure tests?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-19 04:41:37 Re: Windows + IP6 progress
Previous Message Chuck McDevitt 2005-08-18 23:53:15 Re: Windows + IP6 progress