| From: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core |
| Date: | 2005-08-16 05:40:00 |
| Message-ID: | 43017C30.4010308@mailblocks.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have negotiated with the author of pl/Ruby to release plRuby under the
> PostgreSQL license. The reason I did this is the following:
>
> What does everybody think?
>
I think you should take a closer look at PL/Java for the following reasons:
1. The number of followers of the Java language is extremely high and
increasing.
2. Oracle and DB2 offers Java as a procedural language. You make
transisitions easy.
3. There's a SQL standard for the mapping between the SQL and Java language.
4. Middle-tier code is often written in Java and can often be moved to
functions and stored procedures without a rewrite.
5. PL/Java already provide both trusted and untrusted language handlers.
6. PL/Java has a community of over 70 members and increasing.
7. PL/Java has no license issue.
8. The author of PL/Java would be happy to maintain it in core.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-08-16 06:04:14 | ARRAY(subquery) volatility |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-08-16 05:04:25 | Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core |