| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Immutable function WAY slower than Stable function? |
| Date: | 2018-08-07 00:36:59 |
| Message-ID: | 42b63be3-fb79-dc35-3c96-09fc1602b7e0@aklaver.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 08/06/2018 04:44 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:36 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>> wrote:
>
>
> What is the definition for target_date()?
>
>
> Hi Adrian. Happy to provide this info. Though on a side note, I don't
> understand why it should matter, if functions are black box optimization
Black boxes the bane of my existence, different field, control
circuits:) My interest was because you are chaining functions and a
chain is only as strong as it's weakest link. From the surface I am not
seeing anything, will need to mull it over a bit.
> fences. But here are the definitions:
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bear Giles | 2018-08-07 00:44:00 | Re: Re: How to revoke privileged from PostgreSQL's superuser |
| Previous Message | Ken Tanzer | 2018-08-06 23:44:25 | Re: Immutable function WAY slower than Stable function? |