Re: psql and ROLES

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql and ROLES
Date: 2005-08-08 18:02:30
Message-ID: 42F79E36.1080409@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
>
>>*) there is no backslash command for getting a list of Roles (like \du &
>>\dg for Users and Groups) - I'm considering using \dr for that - does
>>that sound sensible ?
>
>
> We could just recycle \du and/or \dg for the purpose. If those should
> still exist as separate commands, what should they do differently from
> \dr? There's no longer any hard-and-fast distinction ...

ok - that seems sensible - I will just reuse \du for this

>
>
>>*) the new connectionlimit code allows for negative Limits (beside -1)
>
>
> Right now, any negative value is interpreted as "no limit". I don't
> feel a pressing need to change that.

ok - in that case we might consider changing the wording in the docs
from "-1 (the default) means no limit" to something like "any negative
value means no limit"

Stefan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-08-08 18:04:30 Re: shrinking the postgresql.conf
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-08-08 17:48:36 Re: shrinking the postgresql.conf