From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql and ROLES |
Date: | 2005-08-08 18:02:30 |
Message-ID: | 42F79E36.1080409@kaltenbrunner.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
>
>>*) there is no backslash command for getting a list of Roles (like \du &
>>\dg for Users and Groups) - I'm considering using \dr for that - does
>>that sound sensible ?
>
>
> We could just recycle \du and/or \dg for the purpose. If those should
> still exist as separate commands, what should they do differently from
> \dr? There's no longer any hard-and-fast distinction ...
ok - that seems sensible - I will just reuse \du for this
>
>
>>*) the new connectionlimit code allows for negative Limits (beside -1)
>
>
> Right now, any negative value is interpreted as "no limit". I don't
> feel a pressing need to change that.
ok - in that case we might consider changing the wording in the docs
from "-1 (the default) means no limit" to something like "any negative
value means no limit"
Stefan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-08-08 18:04:30 | Re: shrinking the postgresql.conf |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-08-08 17:48:36 | Re: shrinking the postgresql.conf |