| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Rocco Altier <RoccoA(at)Routescape(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Cygwin - make check broken |
| Date: | 2005-08-07 18:27:41 |
| Message-ID: | 42F6529D.2050100@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marko Kreen wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 12:08:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>>Couple thoughts here --- one, someone upthread suggested
>>"cyg$(NAME)$(DLSUFFIX" as the proper value for shlib. I didn't
>>see why at first, but now it occurs to me that it might avoid name
>>collisions with Windows-native builds, which use the "lib" prefix.
>>I'm not sure if DLLs for Cygwin and native builds would ever go
>>into the same directory though. Is this worth worrying about?
>>
>>
>
>.exe's in different directories than .dll's but all in PATH.
>
>
>
Especially DLLs in the system directory. Anyway, I see no point *not* to
observe the platform's convention.
I just tested it and make check worked fine.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-07 18:51:12 | Re: Cygwin - make check broken |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-08-07 18:06:42 | Re: Cygwin - make check broken |