Re: Cygwin - make check broken

er that would be this patch.

Andrew Dunstan wrote:

>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> "Rocco Altier" <RoccoA(at)Routescape(dot)com> writes:
>>
>>
>>> It looks like when we changed regress/GNUmakefile to pull rules from
>>> Makefile.shlib, cygwin got broken in the process.
>>> ...
>>> I don't know enough about the rest of the way the cygwin port is put
>>> together, but it seems that the other platforms all have
>>> shlib=lib$(NAME)...
>>>
>>
>> Seems to me that defining shlib that way for Cygwin too would be a
>> reasonable answer, but I'm not sure if there will be any side-effects.
>> Can someone try it?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> The attached patch worked for me. The second part should not be
> applied - I simply include it to illustrate the hack (taken from a
> recent clue on the Cygwin mailing list) that I found necessary to get
> around brokenness on the latest release of Cygwin. The good news is
> that they do seem to be trying to find out what broke and fix it.
>
>