From: | Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kyle Bateman <kyle(at)actarg(dot)com>, pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Trigger on select? |
Date: | 2005-08-03 00:54:59 |
Message-ID: | 42F015E3.8070308@travelamericas.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Kyle Bateman wrote:
> Hey, anyone know if it is possible to fire a trigger before a select?
> I'm considering creating some tables which contain data summarized
> from other tables as kind of a cache mechanism. The hope is I can
> speed up some queries that get executed a lot (and are kind of slow)
> by maintaining data (like sums of big columns, for example). I was
> all ready to go and then I discovered that trigger-before-select is
> not supported. (Is it in any DB?)
>
> The idea is this:
>
> Any time I execute a query that would access the summary data, the
> "before select" trigger fires and goes out and builds any summary data
> missing from the summary table.
No. You must instead generate a view.
> When I do an insert,update,delete on the primary data table, another
> trigger fires that removes the applicable data from the summary
> table. This way, I only cache the information I need in the summary
> table, right before I need it. But it can stay there as long as the
> base information doesn't change so I don't have to redo the expensive
> operation of summarizing it any more often than necessary. Its kind
> of like an index in a way, but it is not maintained at insert/update
> time. Rather, it is updated as it is needed.
>
> Anyone have any ideas about how I can accomplish this?
something like create view wrapper_table as
select * from original table where (select pseudo_trigger_function())
IS TRUE;
The above example is off the top of my head. It may require some editing.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Metatron Technology Consulting
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyle Bateman | 2005-08-03 01:15:27 | Trigger on select? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-02 20:57:09 | Re: Make year 01/01/0001 but leave timestamp alone |