From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Vadim Nasardinov <vadimn(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Java's set of timezone names |
Date: | 2005-07-26 07:08:05 |
Message-ID: | 42E5E155.20700@opencloud.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Vadim Nasardinov <vadimn(at)redhat(dot)com> writes:
>
>>If 8.0 comes with its own copy of a recent zic database, then, in
>>theory, it should be able to handle any timezone known to Java. (The
>>opposite is not necessarily true, as Java's timezone info seems to be
>>missing a lot of recent changes.) Does that sound like a correct
>>statement to you or did I forget some important qualifiers?
>
>
> Yeah, it seems that we are just open to version skew issues between
> different copies of the zic database ... which changes enough that
> that's a nontrivial risk, but I fear we are unlikely to do better.
I noticed in passing that Java and postgres have different ideas about
what (for example) "GMT+10" as a timezone name means. Java considers
that to be east of GMT, postgres thinks it is west.
-O
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc Herbert | 2005-07-26 10:20:09 | Re: getObject(<oid>) returns integer instead of LargeObject |
Previous Message | Rashmi | 2005-07-26 05:47:28 | UNSUBSCRIBE |