| From: | Titus von Boxberg <ut(at)bhi-hamburg(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection |
| Date: | 2005-07-24 10:06:39 |
| Message-ID: | 42E3682F.1080307@bhi-hamburg.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane schrieb:
> "Titus von Boxberg" <ut(at)bhi-hamburg(dot)de> writes:
> It works for me if we want to have an "NFIELDS" construct. Personally
> I'm still not convinced that we need one --- what's the use-case?
I have removed the NFIELDS construct
>
>
> I'd prefer arbitrary expression, but I suppose there's no harm in doing
> the simple case first and generalizing if there's demand.
I took the "no harm" way.
Attached please find the updated patch.
The patch is against HEAD of 050721.
I switched the syntax to your proposal, renamed the functions
in pl_comp.c and updated the sgml doc source and regression
test files accordingly.
Regards
Titus
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| ar-current050720.patch | text/plain | 22.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2005-07-24 12:46:13 | Re: per user/database connections limit again |
| Previous Message | Rocco Altier | 2005-07-24 05:49:26 | Regression - GNUmakefile - pg_usleep |