Kris Jurka wrote:
>On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>
>>Fixed, thanks. This was only on HEAD, not on a taged release of buildfarm.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Should we only be running official releases? I've just got the cvs
>repository checked out and I update at random or when I need a specific
>fix.
>
>
>
No, we should track the _STABLE releases. The idea is to pick up errors
*before* a release.
You can do this very regularly without running excessive builds (unless
you use --force, which you should not be doing). If there are no changes
on the branch no build will be done.
cheers
andrew