Re: multibyte regression tests

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Ayush Parashar <aparashar(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, "majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: multibyte regression tests
Date: 2005-07-15 22:02:56
Message-ID: 42D83290.1070002@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


I am totally confused by your response and Luke's. I think we might be
talking completely at cross purposes. My original question had nothing
to do with the COPY patch.

cheers

andrew

Ayush Parashar wrote:

>Andrew, Luke,
>
>As pointed by Luke, the reason for using mb regression suite (src/test/mb),
>is to consolidate all similar kinds of multi-byte/client encoding tests at
>one place.
>
>Thanks,
>Ayush
>
>On 7/15/05 1:36 PM, "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Andrew,
>>
>>
>>
>>>Good. So should we roll this up into the standard regression suite? Why
>>>are these tests separate? Is it just that they need a UTF8 encoded db
>>>rather than an SQL-ASCII encoded db?
>>>
>>>
>>I think that was the idea - the src/test/mb kit was already there and was
>>designed to create the UTF8 database and controlled circumstances for a
>>conversion test, so we used it for the similar testing for COPY.
>>
>>It could possibly be moved into the "make check" regression suite, if the
>>regression DB is always created with UTF8.
>>
>>Ayush may be able to add to this.
>>
>>- Luke
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-07-15 23:55:14 Re: Segfault Exiting psql
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2005-07-15 21:47:09 Autovacuum name