Re: gborg's apache server ...

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: gborg's apache server ...
Date: 2005-07-15 14:57:06
Message-ID: 42D7CEC2.3010905@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
>>> I have not changed anything either. Jan is the only other person I
>>>know who has access to the server. Is he on this list?
>>
>>You mean Jan Wieck? No, I don't think he is.

I have access but I can't do anything but look at logs. I would be more
than happy to help be a backup admin.

I don't think that "everyone" should have access but more than Marc
would definitely be good.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
>
> Perhaps everyone who has access to a server should be required to be
> subscribed to this list? It may have saved some time in this case.
>
> - --
> Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
> PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200507151014
> https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkLXxMgACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjSHACdGjvcsfPqv3wXZqbPQZmQ7QlL
> agEAn1qeg8Wn5vZWfz7pWFskXr9qAbyn
> =6sLA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions provider, Command Prompt, Inc.
24x7 support - 1.800.492.2240, programming, and consulting
Home of PostgreSQL Replicator, plPHP, plPerlNG and pgPHPToolkit
http://www.commandprompt.com / http://www.postgresql.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2005-07-15 15:01:11 Re: gborg's apache server ...
Previous Message Dave Page 2005-07-15 14:51:29 Re: css bug