From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault |
Date: | 2005-07-12 22:41:53 |
Message-ID: | 42D44731.90306@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
David Fetter wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 03:45:55PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>>
>>In perl, if there is any ambiguity it is the called function that is
>>responsible for checking, not the caller. See "perldoc -f
>>wantarray". PLPerl explicitly passed G_SCALAR as a flag on all
>>calls to plperl routines. So returning a list is a case of pilot
>>error.
>>
>>
>
>Is this a kind of pilot error that documents could help avert in some
>useful way?
>
>
>
>
Sure. "A plperl function must always return a scalar value.More complex
structures (arrays, records, and sets) can be returned in the
appropriate context by returning a reference. A list should never be
returned." Salt to taste and insert where appropriate.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-07-12 23:59:18 | Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2005-07-12 21:01:36 | Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-07-12 23:59:18 | Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault |
Previous Message | Denis Lussier | 2005-07-12 22:07:47 | Re: dbt2 & opteron performance |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-07-12 23:34:55 | Re: Autovacuum integration |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-07-12 22:01:41 | Re: SQLException: Cannot be less than zero |