From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling? |
Date: | 2005-07-11 19:06:08 |
Message-ID: | 42D2C320.6010507@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>Power off on a dev machine ;)
>
>
> Does the dev machine run more than one postmaster?
No.
I've occasionally
> seen similar issues when restarting a clutch of dev postmasters ---
> the kernel may assign a shmem id to one of them that belonged to another
> one in the previous cycle, and if you already started that other one
> then the second gets confused. 8.0 and up have a test that should deal
> correctly with this; what version did you see failing exactly?
This is on my personal dev machine and I am running 8.1Dev.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-07-11 19:10:41 | Vacuum summary? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-07-11 19:04:27 | Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling? |