Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling?
Date: 2005-07-11 19:06:08
Message-ID: 42D2C320.6010507@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>>Power off on a dev machine ;)
>
>
> Does the dev machine run more than one postmaster?

No.

I've occasionally
> seen similar issues when restarting a clutch of dev postmasters ---
> the kernel may assign a shmem id to one of them that belonged to another
> one in the previous cycle, and if you already started that other one
> then the second gets confused. 8.0 and up have a test that should deal
> correctly with this; what version did you see failing exactly?

This is on my personal dev machine and I am running 8.1Dev.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-07-11 19:10:41 Vacuum summary?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-07-11 19:04:27 Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling?