Re: Hmmm 8.1 pg_dumpall cannot dump older db's?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hmmm 8.1 pg_dumpall cannot dump older db's?
Date: 2005-07-08 13:59:02
Message-ID: 42CE86A6.2010309@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> writes:
>
>
>>But after falling back to template1, a version check could be made and
>>if running 8.1 or higher an error message could be displayed.
>>
>>
>
>Once we're connected to template1, we might as well just use it ...
>
>
>
>
Agreed. In any case, I thought that dropping the postgres database was
supposed to be OK if you wanted to work that way. (I also thought
fallback was the way all this was supposed to work anyway).

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darren Alcorn 2005-07-08 14:03:57 Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables
Previous Message Dennis Bjorklund 2005-07-08 13:58:15 Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables