Re: User's exception plpgsql

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: User's exception plpgsql
Date: 2005-07-08 06:30:39
Message-ID: 42CE1D8F.7080903@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Pavel Stehule wrote:
> BEGIN
> EXCEPTION WHEN * THEN
>
> equvalent rules for raise have to be in *
>
> is true?

I'm sorry, but I'm still not sure what you mean.

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD 2005-07-08 07:34:16 Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2005-07-08 04:54:23 Re: User's exception plpgsql

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-07-08 13:58:50 Re: patch: garbage error strings in libpq
Previous Message jtv 2005-07-08 05:41:02 Re: patch: garbage error strings in libpq