| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC |
| Date: | 2005-07-07 16:07:32 |
| Message-ID: | 42CD5344.1060707@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>Just to make my position perfectly clear: I don't want to see this
>>option shipped in 8.1. It's reasonable to have it in there for now
>>as an aid to our performance investigations, but I don't see that it
>>has any value for production.
>
>
> Well, this is the first I am hearing that, and of course your position
> is just one vote.
True but your "feature" was added after feature freeze ;). I don't see
this as a good thing overall. We should be looking for a solution not a
band-aid that if you tear it off will pull the skin.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-07-07 16:11:05 | Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-07-07 15:59:41 | Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC |