| From: | Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)parba(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: per user/database connections limit again |
| Date: | 2005-07-04 11:31:31 |
| Message-ID: | 42C91E13.2010704@parba.cz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>I was wondering if there was some way to defer the user check till a
>later time, when the pg_authid relation could be checked? Not sure if
>that's a good idea, but it may help reduce the impact of the change, and
>thus chances that it'd be rejected.
>
>
Well It can, but it would mean one more lock on procarray and I didn't
want that and like I said, MyDatabaseId is read from flatfile too.
Auth flatfile is used only on two other places which I also patched so I
don't see this as a problem (it's used in hba.c to check role membership
and in crypt.c for password verification)
--
Regards
Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-07-04 12:06:29 | Re: [HACKERS] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-07-04 11:26:54 | Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each |