From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Autotools update |
Date: | 2005-07-03 01:03:55 |
Message-ID: | 42C7397B.9090905@paradise.net.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Does the FreeBSD one actually produce different output? I don't
> remember seeing any of that and I am not running FreeBSD.
>
On my 5.4 system autoconf259 and gnu-autoconf both fetch the *same* src
file (autoconf-2.59.tar.bz2 with md5sum 1ee40f7a676b3cfdc0e3f7cd81551b5f).
The autoconf259 package applys some FreeBSD specific patches - they seem
to be mainly about ensuring the package calls itself 'autoconf259'
instead of plain old 'autoconf', plus a permission change for auxiliary
directories.
(I have attached the 4 patches...)
Mark
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
autoconf259-patches.tar.gz | application/gzip | 1.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-07-03 02:16:17 | Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-07-03 00:32:50 | Re: Autotools update |