Re: Occupied port warning

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Occupied port warning
Date: 2005-06-28 18:46:39
Message-ID: 42C19B0F.90108@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>
>>>What behavior are you proposing, exactly?
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>The least thing it should do is error out if *no* TCP/IP port could be
>>created while listen_addresses is set.
>>
>>
>
>That might be reasonable --- I think right now we only die if we
>couldn't create the Unix socket either.
>
>
>
>
correct (in the cases where we try to create it, e.g. Unix but not Windows).

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-28 19:07:39 Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2005-06-28 18:46:18 Re: ENUM like data type