>>"Knut P Lehre" <k(dot)p(dot)lehre(at)world-online(dot)no> writes:
>> Again, the reported interruption time is identical to the last startup
time.
>I don't see anything wrong here --- the reported timestamp is just that
>of the last checkpoint, and if the server wasn't up long enough to
>create a new checkpoint then this is exactly what you'd expect.
>
> regards, tom lane
I see. Thanks.