Re: Postmaster Out of Memory

From: Jeff Gold <jgold(at)mazunetworks(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Joe Maldonado <joe(at)mazunetworks(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Postmaster Out of Memory
Date: 2005-06-26 19:25:59
Message-ID: 42BF0147.30509@mazunetworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Found it --- the actual leak is in index_create, not in TRUNCATE or
> CLUSTER at all; and it's been there a really long time.
> Patch for 7.4 branch attached.

Excellent! Does index_create refer to something that is invoked as a
consequence of CREATE INDEX? I'm looking through the code on our side
and can't find any obvious places where we recreate indexes, but I might
just be missing something. Might it be a conseuence of repulating a
recently truncated table instead? I'll confer with Joe on this new
information tomorrow. Thanks for taking the time to look into this.

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-26 19:27:25 Re: Postmaster Out of Memory
Previous Message Joe 2005-06-26 18:55:38 Re: Win32 users?