Re: plperl features

This was the patch that I took the array processing piece from and
attempted to fix, since it was badly broken. However, I'm not happy
about any of the ways of doing it, and suspect I won't get it done for
8.1. I think we need that piece done before we look at ANYELEMENT/ANYARRAY.

cheers

andrew

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>Sergej, are you going to repost this patch?
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>>Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>>
>>
>>>Also, I don't think the arg_is_p variable is really the proper fix for
>>>this, but I am unsure what to recomment. Others?
>>>
>>>
>>The thing I didn't like about that was that it assumes there is only
>>one pseudotype behavior that is or ever will be interesting for plperl.
>>
>>I think it'd probably make more sense to store an array of the parameter
>>type OIDs and then check for ANYELEMENT or ANYARRAY as such in the
>>places where the patch uses arg_is_p.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>