From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: language handlers in public schema? |
Date: | 2005-06-24 01:24:23 |
Message-ID: | 42BB60C7.5050109@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>Is there any reason for us to keep putting the language handler
>>functions in the public schema?
>>
>>
>
>I believe one of the issues there is that pg_dump doesn't dump functions
>that are in pg_catalog. You could possibly fix it to make an exception
>for functions that are referenced by pg_language entries, but I think
>this would be a nontrivial change.
>
>
Hmm. Could we not just add something this condition:
or pg_catalog.format_type(prorettype, NULL) != 'language_handler'
in pg_dump.c around line 2191?
I'd like to get this done, but I don't think I'll have time before July
1. How about putting it on the TODO list?
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-24 01:28:09 | Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-06-24 01:12:16 | Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-24 01:28:09 | Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-06-24 01:12:16 | Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes |