language handlers in public schema?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: language handlers in public schema?
Date: 2005-06-24 00:01:31
Message-ID: 42BB4D5B.5060902@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


Is there any reason for us to keep putting the language handler
functions in the public schema? If they were put in, say, pg_catalog (as
I see Peter's pl/sh language does for its handler) then the public
schema could be dropped by people who want to do that with no ill
effect, AFAICS.

cheers

andrew

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-24 00:13:05 Re: Fixing r-tree semantics
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-23 23:38:20 Re: Fixing r-tree semantics

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-24 00:46:31 Re: language handlers in public schema?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-06-23 23:36:54 Another unused variable