Re: GiST rtree logic is not right

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GiST rtree logic is not right
Date: 2005-06-23 06:19:46
Message-ID: 42BA5482.1010301@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I'll look at problem after GiST concurrency. Fixing rtree_gist is bug a fix, not
a new feature, so I'm not limited by 1 July.

> This is doubtless not as high priority as the concurrency stuff you
> are working on, but it'd be good to fix anyway. I was thinking of
> proposing that we move rtree_gist into the core --- but the case for
> it would be stronger if it worked correctly ...
>

--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Hansen 2005-06-23 06:30:45 Re: GiST rtree logic is not right
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2005-06-23 05:04:59 Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes