Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb
Date: 2005-06-20 09:13:45
Message-ID: 42B688C9.4010800@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
>
>>Can't tell whether I could find time for reviewing the docs the next
>>days (more interesting for feature freeze is having fixed the
>>implementation anyway).
>
>
> Of the sixty-odd files that mention template1 in current CVS, only about
> half are documentation.

The decision which files should be changed must be taken. e.g. createdb,
dropdb will use template1 hardcoded. Is it acceptable that those tools
fail if the "postgres" database isn't present any more?

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2005-06-20 09:21:25 Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2005-06-20 08:28:14 Re: Gist Recovery testing