Re: SELECT with sum on groups ORDERING by the subtotals

From: grupos <grupos(at)carvalhaes(dot)net>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SELECT with sum on groups ORDERING by the subtotals
Date: 2005-06-17 17:15:30
Message-ID: 42B30532.1040405@carvalhaes.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Hi Greg,

Thanks for your reply.
Yes, same group of code...

Perfect solution, simple and efficient. Thank you very much!!!

Cheers,

Rodrigo Carvalhaes

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
>
>>I need an subtotal for all the products with the same group and that the
>>query be ordered by the bigger subtotal.
>>
>>
>
>(please proofread: the subtotals in your example output did not add up)
>
>By "same group" I presume you mean the same code, as you don't actually use
>the "group varchar(10)" column you created in your example. A major problem
>you have is that you have no other way of ordering the rows except by the
>code. So having a running subtotal is fairly pointless, as the items within
>each code will appear randomly. Since only the grand total for each code is
>significant, you could write something like this:
>
>SELECT t.*, s.subtotal FROM
> (SELECT code, SUM(total) AS subtotal FROM test GROUP BY 1) s,
> test t
> WHERE s.code = t.code
> ORDER BY subtotal desc;
>
> code | description | quant | price | total | subtotal
>- -------+-------------+-------+-------+-------+----------
> 99120 | PRODUCT C | 10 | 0.8 | 8 | 338
> 99120 | PRODUCT C | 100 | 0.8 | 80 | 338
> 99120 | PRODUCT C | 200 | 0.8 | 160 | 338
> 99120 | PRODUCT C | 100 | 0.9 | 90 | 338
> 92110 | PRODUCT A | 10 | 1 | 10 | 120
> 92110 | PRODUCT A | 5 | 0.9 | 9 | 120
> 92110 | PRODUCT A | 100 | 0.9 | 90 | 120
> 92110 | PRODUCT A | 10 | 1.1 | 11 | 120
> 92190 | PRODUCT b | 10 | 1.1 | 11 | 41
> 92190 | PRODUCT b | 10 | 1.1 | 11 | 41
> 92190 | PRODUCT b | 10 | 1.1 | 11 | 41
> 92190 | PRODUCT b | 20 | 0.8 | 8 | 41
>
>If you don't need all that intermediate stuff:
>
>SELECT code, SUM(total) AS subtotal FROM test GROUP BY 1 ORDER BY 2 DESC;
>
> code | subtotal
>- -------+----------
> 99120 | 338
> 92110 | 120
> 92190 | 41
>
>If you do need the other rows, you will have to specify a way of ordering
>the rows within a code group.
>
>- --
>Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
>PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200506161458
>http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>iD8DBQFCscxavJuQZxSWSsgRAubaAKDXtwvbX4FyvSMeOYqCWAYfStv3xgCfX+XM
>79gJZ2hUgDk1jL3LDQv3le0=
>=mpnW
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
>
>

--
Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antivírus e
acredita-se estar livre de perigo.

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rajesh Kumar Mallah 2005-06-18 16:54:06 partial index on non default tablespace syntax
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2005-06-17 16:09:21 Re: how can i UPDATE without dead rows