Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)
Date: 2005-06-17 10:00:43
Message-ID: 42B29F4B.8080002@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Probably, though the create db issue is a good reason not to use template1.

Create db issue?

> So may I propose to have a pg_system database created by initdb, as a
> copy from template1 in 8.1?

But then dbas will block off access to that db, or drop it and we're
back to square one...

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2005-06-17 10:06:50 7.4.8 compilation failure on Fedora Core 4
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2005-06-17 09:18:30 Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)