From: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
Date: | 2005-06-17 07:16:16 |
Message-ID: | 42B278C0.7050703@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
>> * Reduces the total amount of time the system spends vacuuming since
>> it only vacuums when needed.
>
>
> Can be easily done with cron.
>
>> * Keeps stats up-to-date automatically
>
>
> Which can be done with cron
>
>> * Eliminates newbie confusion
>
>
> RTFM
>
>> * Eliminates one of the criticisms that the public has against
>> PostgreSQL (justifed or not)
>
>
> Agreed.
I few weeks ago I have set up a database with more than 1.800 tables
(some complex business thing). inventing a clever cron-vacuum strategy
is almost impossible (or at least very painful). there should be a
mechanism (fortunately there is pg_autovacuum) to make this a bit more
practical.
in case of small databases this is not an issue.
small is always simple. complex and large are the major challenges.
best regards,
hans
--
Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig
Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria
Tel: +43/664/393 39 74
www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | stig erikson | 2005-06-17 07:19:30 | psql: FATAL: database "template1" is not currently accepting connections |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-06-17 07:03:26 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-06-17 07:34:46 | Re: [PATCHES] Escape handling in strings |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-06-17 07:03:26 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |