| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
| Date: | 2005-06-16 21:03:10 |
| Message-ID: | 42B1E90E.7080602@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andreas Pflug wrote:
>
> We're having a growing zoo of daemons that can be regarded as tightly
> integrated server add-on processes (slony, autovac, pgAgent), and it
> would be really nice (say: win32 users are used to it, thus requiring
> it) to have a single point of control.
>
> Maybe a super daemon (in win32 probably pg_ctl), controlling
> postmaster and all those helper processes (accessible through pgsql
> functions, of course) would be the solition. This keeps the kernel
> clean, separates backend shmem from helper processes and enables
> control over all processes.
>
And this will be ready when? I thought we were discussing what could be
done regarding AVitB between now and feature freeze for 8.1 in about 2
weeks. This surely doesn't come into that category.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-06-16 21:07:17 | Spikesource now doing automated testing, sponsorship of PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-06-16 20:33:37 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |