From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
Date: | 2005-06-16 14:04:00 |
Message-ID: | 42B186D0.2020606@zeut.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
> I completly agree with Gavin - integrating this kind of thing into the
> backend writer or integrate it with FSM would be the ideal solution.
Yes AV should look at FSM data, and it will eventually. I'm not sure
how you would integrate AV with the backend writer, but again if
improvements are made to vacuum, AV might have to change along with it,
but I still think it will be needed or at least helpful.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2005-06-16 14:05:01 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2005-06-16 14:01:53 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2005-06-16 14:05:01 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2005-06-16 14:01:53 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |