| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Edmund Dengler <edmundd(at)eSentire(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] INHERITS and planning |
| Date: | 2005-06-16 04:59:19 |
| Message-ID: | 42B10727.9040804@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> Well, it's not so much that I care about queries with 1000+ relations,
> as that this is a good way to stress-test the code and find out where
> the performance issues are. There are many thousand lines of code that
> can never be performance-sensitive, but to expose the ones that are
> it helps to push the envelope a bit.
Once we have partitioning and people set up automated scripts to
partition off stuff, we may well end up with 1000+ table queries...
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-06-16 05:10:36 | Re: [HACKERS] INHERITS and planning |
| Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2005-06-16 04:58:01 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2005-06-16 05:08:18 | Re: Escape handling in strings |
| Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2005-06-16 04:58:01 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |