| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | david(at)eclipsecat(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dumpall not working? |
| Date: | 2005-06-13 19:22:58 |
| Message-ID: | 42ADDD12.7050407@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
>
> Um - post some of the errors?
>
> There are some very clever people on these lists, but none of them
> psychic afaik ;-)
Speak for yourself. I know you are wearing a blue shirt today! ;P)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jao | 2005-06-13 19:32:00 | Will the optimizer eliminate an unnecessary sort? |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-06-13 19:10:41 | Re: pg_dumpall not working? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-06-13 19:25:29 | VACUUM equivalent to REINDEX DATABASE ? |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-06-13 19:10:41 | Re: pg_dumpall not working? |