Re: Index ot being used

From: Madison Kelly <linux(at)alteeve(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Index ot being used
Date: 2005-06-13 03:42:05
Message-ID: 42AD008D.4080600@alteeve.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 22:00:01 -0500,
> Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 18:52:05 -0400,
>> Madison Kelly <linux(at)alteeve(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> After sending that email I kept plucking away and in the course of
>>>doing so decided that I didn't need to return the 'file_type' column.
>>>Other than that, it would see my query now matches what you two have
>>>recommended in the 'ORDER BY...' front but I still can't get an index
>>>search.
>>
>>No it doesn't. Even if you don't return file_type you still need it
>>in the order by clause if you want postgres to consider using your
>>index.
>
>
> I didn't notice that you had changed the index. The reason this index
> doesn't help is that you can't use it to select on records with the
> desired file_type.

As you probably saw in my last reply, I went back to the old index and
tried the query you and Tom Lane recommended. Should this not have
caught the index?

At any rate, I am re-reading the documents on indexing for 7.4.x on
postgresql.org... This is kind of flustering. Thanks again though for
som much help!

Madison

--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Madison Kelly (Digimer)
TLE-BU, The Linux Experience; Back Up
http://tle-bu.thelinuxexperience.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2005-06-13 03:53:46 Re: Index ot being used
Previous Message Madison Kelly 2005-06-13 03:35:10 Re: Index ot being used