Re: Concrete proposal for large objects and MVCC

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Concrete proposal for large objects and MVCC
Date: 2005-06-11 06:02:01
Message-ID: 42AA7E59.6010104@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> This avoids the risk of creating any serious backwards-compatibility
> issues: if there's anyone out there who does need SnapshotNow reads,
> they just have to be sure to open the LO in read-write mode to have
> fully backward compatible operation.
>
> Comments, objections?

If you feel like it, feel free to make pg_dump custom format restore LOB
comments :)

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kaare Rasmussen 2005-06-11 07:10:31 Re: The Contrib Roundup (long)
Previous Message Thomas F. O'Connell 2005-06-11 01:23:06 Re: CPU-intensive autovacuuming