Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>, Alon Goldshuv <agoldshuv(at)greenplum(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
Date: 2005-06-01 08:34:38
Message-ID: 429D731E.1030404@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> There are some other arguments in favour of a LOAD command.... Alon?

We already have LOAD, so you'll have to choose something else :)

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2005-06-01 08:35:06 Re: regarding storage in postgres
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2005-06-01 08:33:20 Re: Physical Tlist optimization still possible?