From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Minor cleanup for recent SQLSTATE / SQLERRM |
Date: | 2005-05-26 03:46:37 |
Message-ID: | 4295469D.6000703@samurai.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not sure you should have done that; IMHO the right thing is for
> Bruce to back this patch out and ask for a resubmission
I thought about that, but I don't see a need to back out the patch: it
is not fundamentally broken or invasive to the rest of the tree.
Needlessly backing it out and then reapplying an improved version would
seem to only create more CVS traffic.
> you just made it a lot harder for him to do so.
*grumble*, due to CVS being completely broken... Attached is the patch I
applied, so if someone wants to revert both changes they can do so more
easily.
-Neil
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
plpgsql_sqlstate_cleanup-1.patch | text/x-patch | 5.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-05-26 03:48:25 | pgsql: Display only 9 not 10 digits of precision for timestamp values |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-26 03:37:55 | Re: pgsql: Add PL/pgSQL SQLSTATE and SQLERRM support |