From: | Mark Harrison <mh(at)pixar(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
Cc: | Philip Hallstrom <postgresql(at)philip(dot)pjkh(dot)com>, Berend Tober <btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres in government |
Date: | 2005-05-23 17:10:58 |
Message-ID: | 42920EA2.2040803@pixar.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 15:10, Mark Harrison wrote:
>
>>>Sadly, lots of people in positions of power still want scape goats,
>>>rather than proven results.
>>
>>No, it could be that the OP's organization is looking for some proof
>>of postgresql's results.
>
>
> That's a bit out of context. The message I was responding to was the
> one talking about having someone to sue, which is pure fiction, as all
> commercial software licenses make it pretty clear that the most you're
> gonna get is your money back.
>
> Please leave a little more context next time, as it looked from your
> response that my response was to the OP, which it most certainly was
> not.
Sorry, did not mean to do that... Sincere apologies for the mistake!!
>>>Most surely. It's common when people with business degrees but poor
>>>understanding of the scientific method get involved.
>>
>>As opposed to people with science degrees but poor understanding
>>of business methods? :-)
>
>
> I'd say either one is a recipe for disaster, eh? :)
:)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-05-23 21:05:41 | Press looking for Oracle conversions |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2005-05-20 13:49:44 | Re: Postgres in government |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Harrison | 2005-05-23 17:18:25 | pointers to sql standard, or "most common" sql? |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2005-05-23 16:29:34 | Re: PITR restore hot standby |