From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres in government |
Date: | 2005-05-19 19:59:16 |
Message-ID: | 428CF014.9080002@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
Ron Mayer wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> Three large Federal agencies I'm not allowed to mention :-(
>
>
> I'm curious why they can't be mentioned? A NDA regarding the
> technologies used? Classified projects?
I would guess because the people above them don't know their using
PostgreSQL ;)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Harrison | 2005-05-19 20:10:45 | Re: Postgres in government |
Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2005-05-19 19:46:47 | Re: Postgres in government |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Harrison | 2005-05-19 20:10:45 | Re: Postgres in government |
Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2005-05-19 19:46:47 | Re: Postgres in government |