From: | Donald Courtney <Donald(dot)Courtney(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL strugling during high load |
Date: | 2005-05-19 16:54:03 |
Message-ID: | 428CC4AB.50906@sun.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tom
Thanks for the post - I think I am getting this problem for
a synthetic workload at high connection loads. The whole
system seems to stop.
Can you give some examples on what to try out in the .conf file?
I tried
bgwriter_all_percent = 30, 10, and 3
Which I understand to mean 30%, 10% and 3% of the dirty pages should be
written out *between* checkpoints.
I didn't see any change in effect.
/regards
Don C.
Tom Lane wrote:
>"Mindaugas Riauba" <mind(at)bi(dot)lt> writes:
>
>
>> It looks like that not only vacuum causes our problems. vacuum_cost
>>seems to lower vacuum impact but we are still noticing slow queries "storm".
>>We are logging queries that takes >2000ms to process.
>> And there is quiet periods and then suddenly 30+ slow queries appears in
>>log within the same second. What else could cause such behaviour?
>>
>>
>
>Checkpoints? You should ensure that the checkpoint settings are such
>that checkpoints don't happen too often (certainly not oftener than
>every five minutes or so), and make sure the bgwriter is configured
>to dribble out dirty pages at a reasonable rate, so that the next
>checkpoint doesn't have a whole load of stuff to write.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-19 17:16:21 | Re: Tuning planner cost estimates |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-05-19 16:31:47 | Re: Tuning planner cost estimates |