Re: Postgres in government

From: Berend Tober <btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres in government
Date: 2005-05-19 15:59:24
Message-ID: 428CB7DC.7000801@seaworthysys.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

Scott Marlowe wrote:

>On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 21:24, Mark Steckel wrote:
>
>
>>...We are proposing that
>>Postgres be used for the application database. Not too surprisingly we are
>>being asked for additional information because Postgres is open source.
>>
>>
So is the implication that they think open source is a bad thing? I
would think they would question a recommendation for using proprietory
products!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Hallstrom 2005-05-19 16:35:07 Re: Postgres in government
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2005-05-19 15:26:34 Re: [GENERAL] Postgres in government

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dawid Kuroczko 2005-05-19 16:03:09 Re: Count and Results together
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2005-05-19 15:59:02 Re: Shared memory and FreeBSD's jail()