| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry) |
| Date: | 2005-05-18 02:08:43 |
| Message-ID: | 428AA3AB.8050809@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> It also seems that, once you get it up and running, any worthwhile dev
> management system is going to actually take less time / effort to
> maintain than, say, maintaining manually concocted todo lists and
> coordinating development via a mailing list.
>
> Call me a normaliser, but even if the maintenance cost is higher, I
> think it's worth it to have a centralised, authoratitive, organised
> repository for dev task data.
I 100% agree...
There's also this:
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-18 02:11:17 | Re: patches for items from TODO list |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-18 01:17:37 | Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry) |